Media Censors Create Shield Around Obama
By PHYLLIS SCHLAFLY | Posted Tuesday, October 28, 2008 4:30 PM PT
Big Media have pulled out all their stops in trying to elect Barack Obama by withholding from the American people the truth about his radical record and associates. Big Media, their polls and the presidential debates practically ignored front-burner issues important to millions of Americans.
By excluding abortion and same-sex marriage from national debate, Big Media kept voters from knowing that Obama, as chairman of the Illinois Senate Judiciary Committee, killed the “Born Alive” bill, thereby depriving babies born alive from botched abortions of medical care and nutrition.
Big Media obviously didn’t want a repetition of Obama’s embarrassing handling of these issues in the Saddleback dialogue.
The issue of illegal aliens was censored out of the presidential debates and other coverage. The voters were kept oblivious to the fact Obama favors giving driver’s licenses to illegals and John McCain does not. This issue is so powerful with the voters that it played a major role in the dumping of New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer and the unprecedented recall of California Gov. Gray Davis. It could have done likewise to Obama.
How many times have you heard that Obama will cut taxes on 95% of Americans? Have you even once heard Big Media tell us that’s a big lie because 40% of Americans don’t pay any federal income taxes at all?
Talking about “95%” means Obama intends to increase government handouts, such as the earned income tax credit, to nontaxpaying Americans. That would surely be compatible with his promise to “spread the wealth around.”
Big Media have threatened to hang a scarlet letter on anyone who dares to mention Obama’s middle name.
Funny thing, in all the years that I spent criticizing the disarmament-appeasement policies of JFK’s and LBJ’s secretary of defense, Robert Strange McNamara, nobody ever said I was unfair to use his strange middle name.
But Obama is different. Big Media have cloaked him with a security blanket that not only protects him from criticism, but also viciously attacks anybody who tells the truth about Obama’s life story in Indonesia, Hawaii, Kenya or Chicago.
On Oct. 15, the New York Times ran a front-page, above-the-fold, pretend-news article threatening McCain that Big Media will not tolerate any negative attacks on Obama, such as talking about Obama’s relationship with the 1960s terrorist Bill Ayers.
The Times warned McCain and his supporters that it is unacceptable to make “strong political attacks” on Obama or be “sharply personal” or even use an “angry tone.” But the voters have a right to know who are and were Obama’s associates. Old adages are still valid: “Birds of a feather flock together” and “A man is known by the company he keeps.”
Why don’t Big Media tell us that Obama launched his political campaign in the Chicago living room of former Weather Underground terrorist Ayers, who was famous for bombing the U.S. Capitol and the Pentagon?
Why don’t Big Media tell us about the relationship of Obama on school issues with Ayers, who as a professor of education is now working to replace the three R’s with a fourth: rebellion against the U.S. social and economic structure.
When Sean Hannity aired a program about “Obama and Friends,” the New York Times rushed forth to defend Obama’s ties with Ayers and to attack Hannity’s program as “partisan” and “provocative.” We are apparently not permitted to be partisan or provocative about Obama.
How could Obama sit in a church for 20 years where the Rev. Jeremiah Wright spoke hatefully about whites and cursed America as a racist country? Yet Big Media now claim it is racist for anyone to criticize Obama’s long and personal association with Jeremiah “damn America” Wright.
Why don’t Big Media dissect the revelations and biases in Obama’s autobiography, “Dreams From My Father,” with the same journalistic curiosity they use about Sarah Palin’s wardrobe?
Big Media present Obama as some sort of intellectual, but why don’t we hear about his failure to write anything meaningful for the Harvard Law Review when he was its affirmative-action president?
Why don’t we hear more about Obama’s friendship with the communist Frank Marshall Davis, who was part of a Soviet-sponsored network in Hawaii?
Why aren’t we given details about Obama’s financial relationship with Tony Rezko, the Chicago fixer now in prison?
The source of money has always been fair game for anybody to talk about in political campaigns. Why haven’t Big Media assigned their investigative reporters to trace the hundreds of millions of dollars that may be illegally flowing to the Obama campaign from foreign sources?
Pew Research confirms that 70% of Obama’s media coverage has been positive and 60% of McCain’s has been negative.
Memo to the American people: Will we let Big Media decide this election by censoring the news we have a right to know?
Copyright 2008 Creators Syndicate, Inc