Obama: Birth Certificate A VERY, VERY INTERESTING. READ.

Obama: Birth




I have never felt
this idiot was ever born here & he never should have been elected.

He should not be
President since he never grew up in the United States.

What follows should
be considered since they are inconsistent with the “Birth

It was brought to
light that back in 1961 people of color were called ‘Negroes.’ So how can

this ‘birth
certificate’ state he is ‘African-American’ when the term wasn’t even used back

This isn’t over! This
is interesting!



Here is a comment
from a reader to George Ure at UrbanSurvival.com : “As you all know,

Trump made a big deal
about Obama’s birth certificate.



Recently, the White House released Obama’s birth certificate. I will tell you
right now that I had never

given this
“birther” issue any credit. I watched the hype and the
“crazies” come out. I completely dismissed

the entire ordeal



In fact, it was not until the White House released the birth certificate that
it had gained my attention. I am

the studious sort of
guy, and I have plenty of time on my hands. So, I took a close look at this



While I would have thought that this issue would have been closed for good
(and, got the crazies to

crawl back into their
holes), I found two extremely strange inconsistencies that merit some



First of all, the birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama’s
birth as August 4, 1961.

It also lists Barack
Hussein Obama as his father. No big deal, right? At the time of Obama’s birth,

also shows that his
father is aged 25 years old, and that Obama’s father was born in ” Kenya ,
East Africa “.



This wouldn’t seem like anything of concern, except the fact that Kenya did not
even exist until 1963,

two whole years after
Obama’s birth, and 27 years after his father’s birth. How could Obama’s father

have been born in a
country that did not yet exist?



Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the “British East
Africa Protectorate”.

But, this is not the
only thing that I found that just does not jive. The other item that I looked
into was the

hospital that Obama
was born in. On the birth certificate released by the White House, the listed

place of birth is
“Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital”.



This cannot be,
because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called “Kaui Keolani
Children’s Hospital”

and “Kapi’olani
Maternity Home,” respectively.



The name did not change to Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital
until 1978, when these two

hospitals merged. How
can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961
if this

name had not yet been
applied to it until 1978?



Go ahead, look it up. I am not talking crazy talk, these are the facts. Like I
said, I thought that this

was a non-issue until
the actual certificate was released.



Now that it has been released, of course I had to look into it. I have found
these issues, now I know that

something is up. If
you doubt me, just look at the following resources:



Sure as hell, the hospital part is true, as you can read about the 1978 merger


Post-colonial history (from Wikipedia)









The first direct elections for Africans to the Legislative Council took place
in 1957.

Despite British hopes of handing power to “moderate” African rivals,
it was the Kenya African National


Union (KANU) of Jomo
Kenyatta that formed a government shortly before Kenya became independent

on 12 December 1963,
on the same day forming the first Constitution of Kenya.



Perry Will Win Big

Perry Will Win Big

By Bruce

You read it here first: Rick Perry will amble to the
Republican nomination and will win the presidential election easily.  In June I
wrote an article — “Is
Perry the One?
” —
suggesting that Rick Perry may be the best nominee for Republicans.  His
personal life is spotless.  His policies reflect his political beliefs and have
worked the way conservatives intend.

Talking like a tough Texan is the worst thing anyone
can say about him, but that attack will fail.  The unpopularity of George W.
Bush in his last two years created a false notion among leftist elites that
America does not like cowboys.  Wrong: we love leaders who look confident and
act decisively; we love our frontiersman and cowboys.  We like straight talk and
straight shooting.  Most Americans also sense that we desperately need a tough
hombre in the White House in 2013.

We also want heart.  Perry’s long and happy marriage
shows that heart.  His hard work on the family cotton farm shows that too.
Perry’s honorable and significant service in the military shows the courage of a
true patriot.  His love of America’s most noble private organization, the Boy
Scouts, shows that heart too.  Perry’s unabashed faith in God will hurt him only
in Manhattan or in San Francisco.

In stark contrast is our current president.  Has Obama
ever really worked a day in his life?  Did he walk out of church when Reverend
Wright damned America, as Perry would have done?  Can anyone even picture Obama
as a Boy Scout?  Does anyone believe that Obama, who did not give an Easter
measure and who in private parties sneers at Americans clinging to their faith,
believes only in anti-Americanism?

Perry, even at what more nuanced conservatives may
consider his rough edges, stands in dramatic contrast to Obama.  In a nation
which, according to Gallup, is more conservative than at any time in twenty
years and in which every state has more conservatives than liberals, the
Republican Party needs a conservative — not a “compassionate” conservative —
to run straight at Obama.

Why is Washington D.C. more economically upbeat
than any other part of our nation?  Our nation’s capital is doing so well
because politicians have made the federal government our biggest growth
industry.  The attacks on Perry by flacks like  David Axelrod
Texas’ economic growth is because oil — will backfire on the left: yes,
extracting oil, coal, and natural gas can create millions of high-paying jobs,
make the dollar stronger, and increase tax revenues without raising tax rates.
Yet that is what clueless leftists will accuse him of trying to

Perry is not Reagan but he is more like Reagan than
any Republican in the last fifty years.  He is physically strong.  He honed his
speaking skills as a young salesman, and those who worry about him talking like
Bush should listen: he sounds more like Reagan.

Perry, like Reagan, governed the second-largest state
in the Union for multiple terms.  He also has had the chance to connect with
other Republican governors, arguably the strongest force in the party.  Several
governors have come close to endorsing Perry already and more will openly
support him.  His message of genuine federalism is vital to these governors.
Strong support from conservative Republican governors will make winning the
nomination much easier.

Next year anyone touched with the deficit deal in
Washington will be damaged political goods.  Republican political leaders who
have created prosperity at the state level will look much better.  Rick Perry in
2012 will not just be able to run against Barack Obama and congressional
Democrats, whose leaders have appalling bad approval ratings, but Perry will be
able to run against the federal government itself.  He will run as the
longest-serving governor in America running a state (as large as a nation) which

Polls already show Perry leading the Republican
, ahead of a much better-known Romney who has been
campaigning for years.  Gallup shows a very
high intensity level
Perry as well.  As other conservatives drop out, their support will inevitably
gravitate to Perry.  A united Republican Party in 2012, led by a sitting
governor, will sweep to victory.  An America given the choice between an
unapologetic conservative and a clear liberal will give that conservative a

In 1979, enclaves of pundits were feverishly analyzing
the candidates.  It was very clear what would happen: the popular conservative
big-state governor would win the nomination fast and then crush the bitter but
smiling one-term leftist in the White House.  That is exactly will happen next
November 2012.

Page Printed from:

at August 20, 2011 – 11:39:06 AM CDT



Did Feds Allow a Mexican Drug Cartel to Sell Cocaine in the U.S.?

Diana Washington Valdez,El Paso Times

U.S. federal agents allegedly allowed the Sinaloa drug cartel to traffic
several tons of cocaine into the United States in exchange for information about
rival cartels,according to court documents filed in a U.S. federal court.

The allegations are part of the defense of Vicente Zambada-Niebla,who was
extradited to the United States to face drug-trafficking charges in Chicago. He
is also a top lieutenant of drug kingpin Joaquin “Chapo”Guzman and the son of
Ismael “Mayo”Zambada-Garcia,believed to be the brains behind the Sinaloa

The case could prove to be a bombshell on par with the U.S. Bureau of
Alcohol,Tobacco,Firearms and Explosives’“Operation Fast and Furious,”except that
instead of U.S. guns being allowed to walk across the border,the Sinaloa cartel
was allowed to bring drugs into the United States. Zambada-Niebla claims he was
permitted to smuggle drugs from 2004 until his arrest in 2009.

Randall Samborn,assistant U.S. attorney and spokesman for the Justice
Department in Chicago,declined comment.

The court in Chicago had a status hearing on Wednesday and ordered the
government to respond to allegations in Zambada-Niebla’s motion by Sept. 11.

According to the court documents,Mexican lawyer Humberto Loya-Castro,another
high-level Sinaloa cartel leader,had his 1995 U.S. drug-trafficking case
dismissed in 2008 after serving as an informant for 10 years for the U.S.

Guzman and the Zambadas allegedly provided agents of the Drug Enforcement
Administration,FBI and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement with information
about other Mexican drug traffickers through Loya-Castro.

“Loya himself continued his drug trafficking activities with the knowledge of
the United States government without being arrested or prosecuted,”the court
documents state.

Zambada-Niebla met voluntarily with U.S. federal agents on March 17,2009,at
the Sheraton Hotel in Mexico City,which is near the U.S. Embassy,“for the
purpose of his continuing to provide information to the DEA and the U.S.
government personally,rather than through Loya,”court records allege.

Read more.