Obama, The God That Failed

Obama, The God That Failed

By Paul


As someone who has studied, taught, and written about the Middle East for
years, I’m the first to concede that President Obama has a tough task. What
would I do about Libya if I were president? How about Egypt?
I’m not exactly sure. The situations are complex, with too many daunting
unknowns. Chief among them, who, or what, precisely, is behind the
opposition? Would a Gaddafi or Mubarak be replaced by Muslim democrats or
theocrats, by an Ayatollah, by a Hamas, by a Hamid Karzai, by a Saddam or Sadat,
or perhaps by the first Thomas Jefferson in the Arab world?
Of course, my personal struggle with the complexities doesn’t matter much.
I’m not president. Obama is. And alas, it’s here, with Barack Obama as
commander-in-chief, that the left once again has failed itself and America in
the process.
The left pinned its hopes and dreams on Barack Obama. He wasn’t merely
another politician, he was post-modern, post-racial, post-cultural,
post-political. We were told Obama didn’t need political experience. His
international upbringing, his multi-national background, his inherent diversity
and multiculturalism, his youthful hopping and groping from country to country,
culture to culture, faith to faith, through
Islam, Buddhism, asceticism, Christianity
, Augustine, Aquinas, Graham
Greene, Nietzsche, Rev. Wright, and whatever else — heaped atop his overflowing
innate brilliance — would beget a new breed of political man, a supreme
decision-maker worthy of the most vexing challenges. He was no George W. Bush;
he was the anti-Bush.
All of this, of course, was twaddle, but it’s sadly in keeping with the
perverse political-spiritual sentimentality that plagues the left. Liberals have
a bizarre tendency to revere their political leaders as geniuses. They did so
even with the Clintons and Al Gore. In handy contrast, they reflexively
caricature their opponents, irrespective of stature or fact, as stupid. It’s a
very shallow thing to do, a triumph of emotion over logic; still, they do it
Worsening the situation is the hard secularism of today’s left.
Progressives are more agnostic and atheistic than ever. They tend to search for
salvation in politics, which is a god that will always fail. In Obama, many of
them hoped for some sort of political
, approaching levels of earthly omnipotence not possible by previous
This brings me back to the Middle East. Now, with great historic moments — and perhaps opportunities — afloat in Libya and Egypt, on the heels of Iran in June 2009, watching Obama unable to arrive at a clear sense of understanding, let alone direction or purpose, has liberals flummoxed. They wander in the desert without their Moses, who, in a much anticipated speech on Libya last week, at best muttered something about a humanitarian crisis; how utterly unsatisfying.
Remember, too, it was the Middle East that was supposed to be Obama’s
strength. He would be better than Bush, and precisely at the right place and
time. Far from Barack Hussein Obama’s middle name being a liability, liberals
assured us it was his saving grace. Their faithful leader would know what to do,
in a way that “Bush,” Texas rube, was fully incapable.
Instead, Obama appears clueless on the small picture let alone big picture,
as do the wise men and women he has surrounded himself with. Neither teacher nor
disciples have answers.
Of course, those of us not suffering on the left recognized liberals’
grandiose blather about Obama as pure codswallop from the outset. Sadly,
however, and not surprisingly, liberals duped enough moderates and independents
to elect Obama president. And now America suffers en masse, as does,
potentially, the worldwide “March
of Freedom
” that both Bush and Ronald Reagan trumpeted
and pushed
To be fair to Obama, he never billed himself as messiah; his acolytes did.
He was the light that had been hidden under bushel. He needed to be chosen by
the people so his light could shine before men. American wasn’t the beacon, the
Shining City — Barack Obama was.
That brings me, in closing, to a Reagan analogy that provides a measure of
just how tragically out of place Obama is at this historical juncture: When the
Solidarity movement rose up in Poland in opposition to Soviet communism, Ronald
Reagan knew exactly what to do. He was born for that moment; his entire life
experience, from the First Christian Church in Dixon, Illinois to Hollywood to
the White House, had prepared him. His international contacts (unlike Obama’s)
were soul-mates and the real deal, profound figures like Pope John Paul II and
Margaret Thatcher, who in the fullness of time had the proper understanding of
nature, man, Providence. They possessed a shared comprehension of the big
picture. The same was true for movements like Lech Walesa’s Solidarity and
Vaclav Havel’s Charter 77 in Czechoslovakia. Reagan knew what stood behind them
and what opposed them. He got free elections within a decade, and the liars and
thieves were tossed to the ash-heap of history.
And all along, liberals, naturally, called Reagan a moron.
There’s a distinct intellectual vacuity among the American left. I’m
reminded of a Reagan quote regarding the distant-left cousins of liberals:
“Marxist-Leninist thought,” Reagan informed, “is an empty cupboard.”
So it is. And right now, we’re seeing the left empty. After burning down
the house of Bush — torching a good man with every weapon in the smoldering
arsenal — and assuring a Promised Land under Barack Obama, the left appears
naked, with no answers anywhere in the cupboard. No water-turned-into-wine, no
manna from heaven, no Holy Grail. All that remains are false promises from a
false messiah made in the Left’s own image. From Iran to Egypt to Libya, there
are no solutions. This wasn’t supposed to be.
Paul Kengor is professor of political science at Grove City
His books include The
Crusader: Ronald Reagan and the Fall of Communism
How America’s Adversaries Have Manipulated Progressives for a

Save America; Get Outraged

Save America; Get Outraged

April 8th, 2011

Don Feder, GrassTopsUSA.com

Where’s the outrage?
Given what Barack Obama is doing to the Constitution, the economy and our
future, the American people should be up in arms (metaphorically speaking, civility-hysterics
take note). Citizens should be marching on Washington with pitchforks and
flaming brands in hand (also a metaphor).
Every city should see demonstrations to make the most raucous Tea Party rally
look like Sunday night in Pierre, South Dakota.
Instead, it’s a mental fog as usual. Hey, the unemployment rate is now
(barely) below 9 percent! Wasn’t that a cold winter? Gee, I wonder what zany,
drug-induced thing Charlie
will do next?
So, while America burns, we fiddle with our iPhones and talk about the
upcoming HBO series about vampire bootleggers and Borgias duking it out in
Other than Tea Party activists, the public seems supremely unperturbed by
Obama’s relentless assault on America. The president’s March 21-27 approval
rating was 45 percent. At the same point in their first terms, Clinton’s
approval rating was only three points higher – Reagan’s three points lower. Both
were re-elected, you may recall.
It’s true that since Obama occupied the White House, his
party’s stock
has taken
a nose-dive
– a net
of 9 governorships, 7 Senate seats, and 60 House seats. But there’s no
guarantee that trend will continue.
The leader of the party that whines incessantly about the influence of money
in politics has announced he’ll spend $1 billion to win re-election….
Read more.