The Muslim Brotherhood’s Political Pilgrims

The Muslim Brotherhood’s Political Pilgrims

 


 

Posted GMT 2-21-2011 17:28:29

 


 

The Left’s political pilgrimage vis-à-vis totalitarian monstrosities
continues unabated. With the Islamo-Fascist Muslim Brotherhood now poised to
share governance in Egypt in the post-Mubarak era, progressives worldwide are
salivating with glee. And it’s to be completely expected of course: the Left has
a long and eerie tradition of worshiping at the feet of tyrants and terrorists.
The Muslim Brotherhood is the ideological forebear of Hamas and al-Qaeda. Its
top priorities are to implement Sharia law, annihilate Israel, and purify Egypt
from American and Western infections with human blood. Naturally, the Left has
now found a new target for a political romance.
The usual suspects are leading the progressive charge: the
notorious Obama fundraiser group Code Pink, the Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL),
A.N.S.W.E.R., and the International Action Center (IAC), founded by Ramsey Clark. These leftist groups are now on the frontlines
cheering on the Islamists in Egypt as Khomeini-style killing
fields loom ominously on the horizon for the Middle Eastern country. Members of
the political faith simply can’t contain themselves from worshiping at the feet
of tyrants who are set on perpetrating a mass slaughter and are intent on
bringing the carnage to America. Anti-American “feminist” Naomi Klein set the
tone perfectly a few years back for her comrades when, in a column in The
Nation
, she enunciated her heartfelt longing for Muqtada al-Sadr’s
killing fields to come to New York.
And so, our Radical-in-Chief is unsurprisingly joining in on the
Progressive-Brotherhood love-fest, extending his hand of solidarity to the
Muslim Brotherhood and giving the Islamist group a green light to share power in a post-Mubarak Egyptian
government.
Obama is, of course, just doing what comes naturally to him, as he revealed
his own political romance with radical Islam immediately upon taking office.
Back in February 2009, for instance, Obama made sure to reward Hamas for
launching rockets into Israeli towns and cities by flirting with the terrorist
group and announcing plans to place $900 million of American taxpayers’
money into its blood-soaked hands. The president followed up by going on his own
political pilgrimage, traveling to the Middle East in April 2009 to bow in front
of the Saudi king. The love affair was brought to a climax two months later, in
June 2009, this time when the president traveled to Cairo University to address
the Muslim world and invited at least ten Muslim Brotherhood members to attend.
Thus, it makes total sense that the president continued to indulge in putting
quite distinguished people on his “guest lists.” When the Obama White House had
its infamous 2010 Ramadan dinner, the guests included two Islamists: Ingrid Mattson and Salam Al-Marayati. Mattson heads the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) that was named as an
unindicted co-conspirator in the trial of the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development.
An Islamic “charity,” the Foundation was convicted in 2008 for funding
the Palestinian terrorist organization Hamas. Al-Marayati heads the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC), an
anti-Israel organization that spends most of its time obfuscating and
equivocating about the terrorist threat. Al-Marayati has distinguished himself
with his view that if Islamic groups were suspects for the 9/11 attacks, then
Israel should be as well, since it had the “most to gain.”
While the president plays his part, leftist scholars and journalists are also
joining the Brotherhood odyssey. Bruce Riedel is particularly distinguishing
himself in this theater. A senior fellow at the Brookings Institution’s Saban
Center, Riedel is, unsurprisingly, one of Obama’s chief advisors on the Middle
East and is promoting the Muslim Brotherhood, arguing that the U.S. needs to befriend and show warmth to the
group — as well as to Hamas and Hezbollah. In his mind, the onus is on the
United States to “understand” the Muslim Brotherhood, because it “is the most
reasonable face of Islamic politics in the Arab world today.”

Salon reporter Justin Elliott, meanwhile, is calling for an
American dalliance with the Brotherhood. He is joined by John Feffer,
co-director of the leftist think tank Foreign Policy In Focus, who is hailing
the Islamist group, titling his recent Huffington Post article “Two Cheers for the Brotherhood.” There are also the likes of
Islamist apologists and leftists like Reza Aslan who are trying to get the
Brotherhood into power in Egypt by sanitizing it. As Aslan adamantly implores for all of us to understand, the
Muslim Brotherhood is not really so bad and doesn’t represent a threat at all.
Why? Well, because “people like Mike Huckabee and Rick Santorum” are just as
dangerous since they are “two men whose views on the role of religion and
politics are almost identical to those of the Muslim Brotherhood.” That’s a
comparison for the record books.
In reaching out to the Muslim Brotherhood, all these leftists are taking a
page from the book of their guru Jimmy Carter, who has led his political flock
by example — and, oh, let us count the ways. Carter pulled the rug out from
under the shah’s feet in 1979 and helped the Ayatollah Khomeini achieve power in
Iran. He went out of his way, during the Gaza War in the winter of 2008–2009,
to support Hamas, whose main purpose is to annihilate Israel — and whose members
spend time reading Mein Kampf and doing the Nazi salute.
In a Washington Post piece titled “An Unnecessary War,” Carter spoke dismissively of Israel’s
thirst for life as if Article XI in Hamas’ charter doesn’t exist and as if the
Nazi organization is some kind of social welfare agency. Getting down into the
moral sewer for the millionth time in his life, he referred to “a defensive
tunnel” being dug by Hamas — you know, sort of like the Nazis had to build the
“defensive” chambers at Auschwitz, Buchenwald, Dachau, and Treblinka.
Carter also did his progressive duty and traveled to meet and worship the
objects of his veneration in person. In April 2008, he embarked on a political
pilgrimage to Cairo and Damascus to show his personal affection to various mass
murderers. Part of his itinerary included a face-to-face passionate encounter
with Hamas leader Khaled Meshal, the mastermind of several high-profile terror
attacks.
Carter was clearly trying to outdo MIT professor Noam Chomsky in dancing with Islamist devils. It remains a
debatable question who wins on the tally sheet of this particular leftist
dance-off. It could legitimately be argued that Chomsky has outscored all other
members of the political faith in setting the tone for the Left’s current Muslim
Brotherhood romance.
Back in May 2006, for example, he traveled to Lebanon to consummate a
political love affair that he had begun in the 1990s. Arriving in a southern
suburb of Beirut, Chomsky entered the headquarters of Hezbollah and warmly
embraced the terror organization’s secretary general, Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah.
It was a thrilling moment for the professor, for finally he could apologize to a
Nazi for being a Jew in person. And there Chomsky was, with the distinguished
honor of standing in the company of the bloodthirsty jihadist murderers who had
slaughtered 241 American servicemen at the Marine barracks in Lebanon in 1983
and, of course, untold numbers of Israeli citizens over many years.
Chomsky justified these murderous crimes as “legitimate resistance” against
an oppressor. Having praised the terrorist organization throughout the 1990s,
Chomsky could now put his complete seal of approval on Hezbollah. And he did: he
gave his blessing to Nasrallah, praised his cause, and approved his refusal to
disarm.
And so, the current leftist romance with the Muslim Brotherhood has its solid
foundations to stand on. The historical precedents and inspirations are there,
in infinite numbers, to give guidance and sanctioning for the new terror-loving
and monster-venerating political pilgrims of our time.
By Jamie Glazov
www.pajamasmedia.com

Israel: White House not reliable

FROM
WND’S JERUSALEM BUREAU

Israel: White House not reliable

Politician slams Obama’s ‘lack of leadership’


Posted: February 20, 2011
6:58 pm Eastern

© 2011 WorldNetDaily

 


 


Israeli lawmaker Danny
Danon

 
Israel can no longer rely on the White House and must trust only itself due
to a lack of leadership on the part of President Obama, declared a Knesset
member from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s ruling Likud party.
“We have to understand that if, God forbid, we will be in the case of
trouble, we can trust only ourselves because we see a lack of leadership coming
from the U.S. today,” said Likud Knesset Member Danny Danon.
“And we should be worried about it, because we always think, well, we have a
friend in the White House, we can call them when we are in need, and we see that
is not the case,” said Danon, the deputy speaker of Israel’s parliament.
Danon was speaking in an interview with reporter Aaron Klein in the latter’s
investigative program
on New York’s WABC Radio
.
The Israeli politician took the occasion to slam Obama’s treatment of
Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak.
 

Hear WND’s Aaron Klein
interview Israeli lawmaker Danny Danon

/images2/wndAudio.swf?url=/files/dannydanon.mp3

 
Following weeks of unrest targeting Mubarak’s regime, Obama called for the
U.S. ally to allow for the immediate transition to democracy, leading to
Mubarak’s resignation.
“We don’t see a leadership role of the American president and actually they
(the Obama administration) are following what is happening in the Middle East.
On the one hand, they support Mubarak; the next day they are against him.”
Danon added, “Frankly speaking, unfortunately we see a lack of leadership

coming from Washington. They don’t actually take decisions. They follow, and
they look at the news and then they deliver statements to the media.”
(Story continues below)
 

 
Danon said the Israeli government believes Obama’s policies on Israel do not
reflect the will of the U.S. public.
“I know that we have a lot of supporters in the U.S.,” he said. “And I know
that what I am hearing in the U.N. and also in the White House, it does not
represent the American people and all the amount of support that we get from the
people in the U.S. who love and support us.”
Danon was referring specifically to Obama’s longstanding call on a complete
halt to all Jewish settlement activity as a precondition for Israeli-Palestinian
talks.
The Knesset member also commented on an Egyptian decision to allow the
passage of two Iranian naval vessels through the Suez Canal for the first time
since 1979.
“We are not worried about the warships,” said Danon. They are not dangerous
to us. The capabilities of those wars they are not a threat to Israel.”
Continued Danon: “But it show us that the Iranians are looking to get
involved in the Middle East and they are sending a signal. So those boats are a
signal to us and to the larger society that we need to wake up because if we
will not deal with the threats of Iran, Iran will deal with us.”
Danon said that in the decision of one minute Israel “can take care of those
boats.”
“But they are sending us a signal and we must listen to that signal,” he said
of the Iranian ships.

Read more: Israel: White House not
reliable
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=266249#ixzz1EcBM2ZXb