Canadian public sleepwalking into North American Union: Obama and Harper set to sign secretive arrangement

Canadian public sleepwalking into North American Union: Obama and Harper set to sign secretive arrangement

Research Fellow refers to Canadian sovereignty as an “allergy”

Edited by John Stokes

The Conservative government is set to formally establish a North American Union (NAU) in the guise of a “landmark security and trade deal with the United States, designed to create a perimeter around North America and allow people and goods to flow more freely across the border.”

Sources suggested that Prime Minister Stephen Harper and President Barack Obama will sign the broad-ranging  NAU agreement in Washington as early as next month, which will over-ride Canadian social policy; universal public healthcare rights, and Canadian constitutional rights in general.

Colin Robertson, a senior research fellow with the Canadian Defence and Foreign Affairs Institute, said the Agreement is an attempt by the Canadian government to link security to improved access to the U.S. for Canadians.

“‘Perimeter’ is a vital word because back in the Chrétien government days we couldn’t use it because we would get caught up in the sovereignty allergy we too often have,” he said. “It makes a lot of sense.”

Check out:

Former member of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard says Iran uses mosques in U.S. to plot jihad terror

NOTE: Because Islam, with its shariah law,  is not just a religion but also an
ideology (both totalitarian and imperialist), a mosque is not just a house of
prayer. A mosque is also a center for the propagation of that ideology, an
outpost for the spread of that ideology.]


Former member of Iran’s Revolutionary
Guard says Iran uses mosques in U.S. to plot jihad terror


There is no surprise in this, except for those Westerners who buy the
politically correct line that mosques are benign houses of worship that are
never used for any nefarious purposes. In reality, mosques have been used to preach
; to spread exhortations to terrorist activity; to house a bomb
; to store weapons; to disseminate
messages from bin Laden
; to demand (in the United States) that
non-Muslims conform to Islamic dietary restrictions
; to fire on
American troops
; to fire upon Indian troops; or to train
“Iran Using Western Mosques to Plot Terrorism?,” from CBN, December 16:

[…] Reza Khalili: Mosques are supposed to be a place for prayer. A
place for submission to God. But they are used as a
recruitment center, for backdoor meetings, transfer of arms and cash and putting
together terrorist activities
and I was involved in some of their
Erick Stakelbeck: You made a key point, that Iran used mosques and Islamic
cultural centers in the West to further its agenda…could you get a little bit
more specific about that? How does Iran uses mosques here in the U.S. and in
Europe to plot terrorism?
Khalili: I can tell you from experience: I was part of the operation, I was
involved in the Islamic community, and I can tell you clearly that out of
mosques, there was a big effort within the Afghan communities by the Iranian
Revolutionary Guards members–and with Pakistanis, Turks and others. And they
would recruit from them, they would transfer cash and arms. And mosques
provided a safe haven
, and actually, in my view, were one of the centers
of the operation. So if an intelligence agency such as the CIA infiltrates a
mosque and understands that there is a specific Guards member who runs it, then
actually they could be very successful in drawing a chart of all the terrorist
activities in that specific region. That’s how central the mosque operation
Stakelbeck.: And that’s in Europe–you were involved in some of these
operations in Europe. How about the U.S.?
Khalili: It’s absolutely the same. They recruit, they train, they sell the
ideology of martyrdom, and many, many are guided and connected to terrorist
groups. And you’ve seen this: many U.S. born citizens, Muslims, unfortunately,
have been sold this idea and are sent to Al Qaeda camps or others. But the Iranians are very active in this country through the mosques and
Islamic cultural centers
to make those connections and run those

Homeland Security to ‘battle’ climate change

Homeland Security to ‘battle’ climate change

Rick Moran


I imagine they’ll call this a “man
caused disaster” too:

At an all-day White House conference on “environmental justice,”
Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano announced that her department is
creating a new task force to battle the effects of climate change on domestic
security operations.
Speaking at the first White House Forum on Environmental Justice on Thursday,
Napolitano discussed the initial findings of the department’s recently created
“Climate Change and Adaptation Task Force.”
Napolitano explained that the task force was charged with “identifying and
assessing the impact that climate change could have on the missions and
operations of the Department of Homeland Security.”
According to the former Arizona governor, the task force would address
specific questions, including:
“How will FEMA work with state and local partners to plan for increased
flooding or wildfire or hurricane activity that is more serious than we’ve seen
before? What assistance can the Coast Guard bring to bear to assist remote
villages in, for example, Alaska which already have been negatively affected by
changes up in the Arctic?”

This sounds like a lot more fun than protecting the country from terrorists,
doesn’t it? It actually makes sense – if you believe that there will be
“increased flooding or wildfire or hurricane activity that is more serious than
we’ve seen before.” So far, sorry Janet but the disasters just aren’t big
enough. Of course, that won’t stop DHS from carving out a bureaucratic niche for
themselves so they can horn in on some of that global climate change dough the
government is throwing around.
Just another opportunity to grow the size of government at our

Page Printed from:

at December 18, 2010 – 11:35:17 AM CST

// <![CDATA[//