How The Democrats ‘Chummed The Waters’ For This Financial Crisis And Government ‘Feeding Frenzy’

McCain hits Obama’s Chicago Ties in new ad

McCain hits Obama’s Chicago Ties in new ad

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQ0cq4Nytu8&eurl=http://www.americanthinker.com/printpage/?url=http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/09/mccain_hits_obamas_chicago_tie

Rick Moran
I was wondering when the McCain camp was going to get around to attacking Obama’s ties to the Chicago machine. It is fertile ground to plow what with Obama’s connections to some of the shadier politicians in America; Daley, Stroger, Rezko, Emil Jones, and host of others.

The latest ad from the McCain campaign connects Obama to this corrupt city political operation:”Not ready to lead” indeed.

The Second American Revolution

The Second American Revolution

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKFKGrmsBDk

Enough is enough

Monday, September 22, 2008

BREITBART: Enough is enough

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

With George Bush off the front pages for much of the last few months, the political pathology known as Bush Derangement Syndrome (BDS) took an unexpected summer hiatus.

BDS sufferers – liberal Democrats seething over successive presidential election losses and hamstrung by a Republican president confidently wielding wartime authority – failed to transfer their enmity to Sen. John McCain, largely because they couldn’t bust his “maverick” brand, but to a larger extent because they assumed Sen. Barack Obama was going to win in a laugher.

That presumption ended when Mr. McCain chose Sarah Palin as his running mate. Before Charlie Gibson could even grill the Alaska governor over her “hubris” in accepting Mr. McCain’s historic invitation, the raw rage that focused for eight years on the 43rd president of the United States transferred in a flash to a former “Miss Congeniality” and Anchorage suburban mother of five who immediately swung the momentum to Mr. McCain’s side.

Palin Derangement Syndrome, a more irrational variant of the Bush contagion, doesn’t require sufferers to know anything about the subject of their hatred. Anonymous, unsourced rumors fuel the fire (book banning, speaking in tongues, creationism, etc.). Lovely family photos hacked from a personal e-mail account displayed on commercial Web sites push more buttons. Asterisks from Mrs. Palin’s biographical sketch – “moose hunter,” “small-town mayor,” “wife of champion snow machine racer” – cause excessive sweating and irregular heartbeats. She even fired a guy who Tased a 10-year-old. (Oh wait, she didn’t.)

What will happen when they find out she shops at Wal-Mart?

Predictably, the celebrity left – ridiculous enough to form a strong opinion based on unreliable data points and narcissistic enough to broadcast it – has taken to stage, television, newsprint and blogs to express its extreme ire at the Thrilla from Wasilla.

Sandra Bernhard celebrated the 20th anniversary of her career-ending one-woman show, “Without You I’m Nothing,” warning that if Mrs. Palin were to go to Manhattan she’d be “gang-raped by [her] big black brothers.” The lipstick-on-a-pig lesbian also called Mrs. Palin a “bitch” and an “Uncle Woman.”

Joyless niche comedian Margaret Cho blogged, “She is evil,” fantasized about having hateful sex with Mrs. Palin and attacked a multitude of her supporters: “If you were truly Christians, you would let gays get married, and send them #$%ng presents from Bed Bath and Beyond!”

Everything-aholic Lindsay Lohan (“Mean Girls”) joined the Sapphic pile-on by issuing a joint diatribe with her putative partner, disc jockey Samantha Ronson: “Is our country so divided that the Republicans’ best hope is a narrow-minded, media-obsessed homophobe?”

“Media obsessed?” Those cameras follow Mrs. Palin because she’s running for vice president. Not because she’s going to the Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf – like some people we know.

Not since Rosie O’Donnell & Co. manhandled Elizabeth Hasselbeck weekdays on “The View” have liberals been so gleeful to watch a bitter lesbian tear down a confident and beautiful conservative Republican woman. Unresolved high school lust and angst at well-adjusted cheerleaders and popular prom queens should be left for medical professionals, not for midmorning television gabfests.

For many, gay marriage is a key issue.

Yet none of these gilded-ghetto living haters point out that their savior, Mr. Obama, stands against gay marriage, too. Is that change Melissa Etheridge can believe in?

Like President Clinton, who supported regressive anti-gay-rights legislation such as “don’t ask, don’t tell” and the Defense of Marriage Act, Mr. Obama gets a massive pass from the activist gay left and their stenographers in the mainstream media.

The never-reported political reality is that both Mr. Clinton and Mr. Obama understand that key components of the Democratic Party – the black and Hispanic blocs – hold views that Brad Pitt would deem “homophobic.”

For these minority groups, and for many other religious Democrats, gay marriage is a nonstarter.

Yet liberal celebrities and activist journalists never hurl epithets at these coddled groups no matter how retrograde their ideas. President Bush correctly pegged this phenomenon as “the soft bigotry of lowered expectations.” Political correctness, the rigging of politics using different rules for different groups, and buttressed by the media, ensures that Democrats always have the upper hand.

Clumsy on her lesbian training wheels, Miss Lohan and Miss Cho, Miss Bernhard and Miss O’Donnell, are granted immunity for their outrageous rhetoric because they are party girls – Democrats through and through – and creatures of the media. And because of this protection racket, none will be forced to attend sensitivity training for crossing the line last week against Mrs. Palin.

It’s also why few will know that the Alaska governor vetoed legislation that would have prevented gays from getting marriagelike benefits. It’s also why the media made Republicans Mark Foley and Larry Craig the butts of jokes that would be considered homophobic if hurled at liberal Democrats.

Not since the drubbing of Clarence Thomas during his 1991 Supreme Court confirmation hearings have liberals in Hollywood and the elite media so openly conspired to deny a minority the right to free thought and free expression of political ideals. Now Sarah Palin is exposing the Democratic Media Complex to a new generation, many of them open-minded women.

Perhaps if he wins in November, the eminently tolerant John McCain will pick an openly gay person to serve high in his administration.

That’s when the real Democratic Party derangement will begin.

Andrew Breitbart is the founder of the news Web site breitbart.com and is co-author of “Hollywood Interrupted: Insanity Chic in Babylon – the Case Against Celebrity.”

Trump Endorses McCain

Palingate: Extensive Evidence Suggests Barack Personally Behind Spreading False Palin Rumors, With Built-In Coverup

Palin ‘Gets it’ on Iran (Updated)

Palin ‘Gets it’ on Iran (Updated)

Ethel C. Fenig

In an action resembling a bizarre Saturday Night Live sketch organizers of a non/bipartisan rally opposing Iran’s President Ahmadinejad and his hate filled message were forced to retract an invitation to Governor Sarah Palin (R-AK) to speak because Senator Hillary R. Clinton (D-NY), (D-IL) and would rather allow hatred than share a platform with her.
However Palin didn’t let this pettiness distract her from the importance of the issue.  At a rally in Minnesota,  Palin forcefully stated
“John McCain and I are committed to drawing attention to the danger posed by Iran’s nuclear program and we will not waver in our commitment,” Palin told a crowd of 9,000 supporters in Blaine, MN. “I will continue to call for sustained action to prevent Iranian President Ahmadinejad from getting these weapons that he wants for a second holocaust.”
Further proving that the Governor from faraway Alaska has her priorities straight, Palin continued
“Unfortunately, though some Democrat partisans put politics first and now no elected official will be able to appear at that “Stop Iran” rally. Iran’s pursuit of these weapons should concern all Americans; this should not be a matter for partisan politics,” Palin said.
Compare her mature attitude to Clinton’s, who even though the UN is in her jurisdiction, withdrew when she learned Palin was invited.
Who has more understanding of the issues, the so called inexperienced governor of a small state or the so called experienced senator from a large, cosmopolitan state?

UPDATE

Ed Lasky points us to Palin’s speech she was going to give at the rally that was published in the  New York Sun.

Ed adds:

“The estimable New York Sun published the speech Governor Sarah Palin would have given at the Iran rally in front of the United Nations had political machinations by Democrats, The Obama campaign, and left-wing groups Jewish groups (such as the J Street Pac with ties to George Soros and Barack Obama) not led the rally’s organizers to disinvite her.”

 

I am honored to be with you and with leaders from across this great country — leaders from different faiths and political parties united in a single voice of outrage.

Tomorrow, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad will come to New York — to the heart of what he calls the Great Satan — and speak freely in this, a country whose demise he has called for.

Ahmadinejad may choose his words carefully, but underneath all of the rhetoric is an agenda that threatens all who seek a safer and freer world. We gather here today to highlight the Iranian dictator’s intentions and to call for action to thwart him.

He must be stopped.

A pity she never got to deliver it.