United Nations OKs State-Sanctioned Mass Rape

United Nations OKs State-Sanctioned Mass Rape

while condemning Israel for defending itself

by Bill Levinson

As shown by “Another U.N. Classic” (Wall Street Journal, March 2, 2007; Page A10), the same organization that sanctions child molesting and child rape by its so-called peacekeepers (Google on “United Nations” and “sex for food”) has blocked discussion of state-sanctioned mass rape in Burma (Myanmar) and Sudan. This comes as no surprise given the United Nations’ proven lack of honesty, character, and integrity.

On the occasion of the annual meeting of the U.N.’s Commission on the Status of Women, the American delegation decided to organize a panel on the subject of “State-Sanctioned Mass Rape in Burma and Sudan.” …Enter U.N. bureaucrat Sylvie Cohen of the Division for the Advancement of Women. Ms. Cohen refused to list the panel discussion on the U.N.’s Web site because it “would be perceived as offensive to named member states.”

While the United Nations has never had a problem with “offending” Israel by calling it a racist or apartheid state, it is apparently quite [Michael Savage nasal whining tone] sensitive [/Michael Savage nasal whining tone] to the sensibilities of barbaric dictatorships like Myanmar and Sudan. Also recall that it is Sudan that is crucifying and enslaving Negro Christians for being Christians.

From Freedomhouse.org, we have the freedom ratings of the kinds of countries that the United Nations does not want to offend. Ratings are on a 1-7 scale, with 7 being the worst.

Burma (Myanmar) (2006)
Political Rights: 7
Civil Liberties: 7
Status: Not Free
Population: 50,500,000
GNI/Capita: $105

Sudan (2006)
Political Rights: 7
Civil Liberties: 7
Status: Not Free
Population: 40,200,000
GNI/Capita: $460

Both countries are prima facie evidence that Rudyard Kipling was 100 percent right about Western Civilization’s Burden“. Myanmar and Sudan are obviously unfit to govern themselves, and it is unfortunate that Sudan is no longer under British colonial rule.

In any event, we understand why the United Nations, which is into pedophilia, child molesting, and child pornography (again, Google on “United Nations” and “sex for food” to see what we mean) has no problem with state-sanctioned rape. The United Nations is totally unworthy of respect by any civilized person.

Posted by Bill Levinson @ 8:23 pm |


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: