Putin’s Middle East Visit

Putin’s Middle East Visit
By Ariel Cohen
FrontPageMagazine.com | March 2, 2007

Vladimir Putin’s February 11 visit to
Saudi Arabia was the first ever for any Russian or Soviet leader. Putin also visited
US allies Jordan and
Qatar. Coming from
Munich where Putin delivered his most bellicose anti-American speech, he further delineating a Russian Middle Eastern policy at odds with
Washington in an interview with Al Jazeera.  Putin reiterated
Russia‘s opposition to the
Iraq war and disputed the justice of Saddam’s execution. He was also critical of
US democracy promotion in the
Middle East, quoting the empowerment of Hamas and Hezbollah as a result of parliamentary elections promoted by
Washington. At the same time, he justified
Russia’s refusal to recognize Hamas and Hezbollah as terrorist organizations on the basis of their victory in parliamentary elections in the
West Bank and
Gaza in January 2006.

Also, during his visit to the Saudi capital, Putin stunned the world with an offer to sell
Saudi Arabia “peaceful” nuclear reactors. In addition, he offered 150 T-90 tanks and other weapons. During his Middle East tour, the Russian president indicated Russia’s willingness to sell helicopters, to build rocket propelled grenade (RPG) factories, and to provide sophisticated anti-aircraft systems—the Carapace (Pantsyr), TOR M1 and Strelets—and topped it off by offering the Saudis expanded satellite launches and an opportunity to join the Russian satellite navigation system, GLONASS.

During his visit to Qatar, the third largest natural gas producer in the world, Putin also indicated that the Iranian offer to form an OPEC-style cartel of gas producers was “an interesting idea” – after his minister had dismissed it out of hand—and invited Saudi banks to open wholly-owned subsidiaries in
Russia.

 

Putin summed up
Russia’s new foreign policy and
Middle East policy as follows:
 

From the point of view of stability in this or that region or in the world in general, the balance of power is the main achievement of these past decades and indeed of the whole history of humanity.  It is one of the most important conditions for maintaining global stability and security…  

I do not understand why some of our partners [
Europe and the
US – AC] … see themselves as cleverer and more civilized and think that they have the right to impose their standards on others. The thing to remember is that standards that are imposed from the outside, including in the
Middle East, rather than being a product of a society’s natural internal development, lead to tragic consequences, and the best example of this is
Iraq.
 

This Realpolitik talk was praised in Arab capitals, where the old Soviet anti-Western and anti-Israel stance is still remembered fondly. King Abdullah I of
Saudi Arabia bestowed the King Faisal Award on Putin, calling him “a statesman, a man of peace, a man of justice.”  Quite a turnaround from the jihad funded against the Soviets by the Saudis twenty years ago during the Soviet occupation of
Afghanistan.  It is also worth noting that
Saudi Arabia officially decries the 100,000 killed and 500,000 displaced Muslims in
Chechnya, while private groups based in the Gulf support terrorists there.
 

At odds with the West 

There are a number of factors driving Putin’s recent rhetoric and actions in the
Middle East. First, by embracing Middle Eastern monarchies and Islamist authoritarianism in
Iran, he signals
Russia’s continuous distancing from Western norms of internal political behavior. This has important implications, as 2007-2008 are election years in
Russia. Putin is now loudly rejecting the American democracy and human rights approach, which has stumbled and sputtered in the
Middle East.

Second,
Russia is following the Soviet model of opposing first British and then the
US presence in the
Middle East by playing to anti-Western sentiment in the “street” and among the elites. Putin’s
Munich speech, his Al Jazeera interview, and his press conferences in
Jordan and
Qatar solidified the Kremlin’s public diplomacy message, emphasizing its differences with
Washington.
 

Third, the Russian leadership is concerned with the high Muslim birthrates in
Russia, especially as the Slavic Orthodox population is declining.
Russia is facing an increasingly radicalized Muslim population along its southern “soft underbelly,” particularly in the
North Caucasus, where two Chechen rebellions, even though they were effectively crushed, led to the spread of Salafi Islam. Many young Russian Muslims view themselves more as members of the global Islamic Ummah (community) than as citizens of Mother Russia. Keeping Muslim powers such as
Saudi Arabia and
Iran at bay, preventing them from supporting insurgencies in
Eurasia, and toning down radicalization through Islamist education and propaganda, is an unspoken but important item on the Kremlin’s agenda.
 

Finally,
Russia is a high-cost oil producer, the largest oil producer in the world, the largest oil exporter outside of OPEC, and the largest gas producer. As such, it is interested in maintaining a high energy price environment, which is usually generated by tensions and conflicts in the
Middle East.
Russia is perfectly willing to sell weapons to both sides of the growing Sunni-Shia divide. This was evidenced when the same nuclear reactors – peaceful, of course, and the same anti-aircraft systems, were offered both to Iran and to the Arab Gulf states, which are increasingly nervous about the growing Iranian military power and nuclear ambitions. As one Russian observer put it, weapons sales create allies.
Russia is using weapons and nuclear reactor sales the way imperial
Germany used railroads – to bolster influence and to undermine the dominant power in the
Middle East.
 

What Can
Washington Do?
 

Clearly, the new
Middle East, in which
US power and prestige are threatened in
Iraq, and where
Moscow is challenging the
US superpower status, is going to be a more competitive and challenging environment. Today’s
Middle East needs to be viewed with the realism and toughness its history and culture requires.
 

The
US, as a status quo power in the
Middle East, should bolster its relations with pro-Western regimes in the Gulf. While some weapons sales and business projects will inevitably take place, only by maintaining a security umbrella in the Gulf can the
U.S. have a bigger clout in the region than
Russia.
 

The
US should continue dialogue with
Moscow on issues of mutual concern, such as nuclear proliferation, terrorism, and destabilizing weapons sales. But more importantly, it should be providing military assurances to Gulf countries against Iranian encroachment, which
Russia is incapable of giving; expanding cooperation in the fight against terrorism, which threatens the Middle Eastern monarchies; and being competitive in cutting edge economic ventures in which
Russia lacks expertise, while granting access to
US capital markets for development projects.
 

After a 20-year hiatus,
Russia is forcing its way back through the open
Middle East door.
Washington decision makers had better take note.

One Response to “Putin’s Middle East Visit”

  1. Right Truth Says:

    Sunday Reading List 3/4/07

    State of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and Conquest of America, from MAGISTER SVENGALI Michael Young takes a swipe at Seymour Hersh. from Tears for Lebanon 961 Lebanon Minuteman Founder Under Attack By Internal Terrorists, The Land of the Free


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: