How big is your carbon footprint?

Blocking Cold Cash William Jefferson — The guy that hid a br in his freezeribe

Professor at Kent State University running Jihad web site

Professor at Kent State University running Jihad web site

“Are You Prepared for Jihad?” IN THE NAME OF OBL. 2007: THE YEAR OF ISLAMIC VICTORY!” “OBL” — you know who that is. Talk of “Crusaders” and praise for suicide bombers. Run by a Kent State prof.

“Me and Julio Down by the Schoolyard,” by Mike S. Adams (thanks to all who sent this in):

Yesterday afternoon, I logged on to the “Global War” blog ( of Associate Professor Julio Pino – a Muslim convert who teaches at Kent State University. The heading for the site used to read “The Worldwide Web of Jihad: Daily News from the Most Dangerous Muslim in America.” Now it reads “Are You Prepared for Jihad?” IN THE NAME OF OBL. 2007: THE YEAR OF ISLAMIC VICTORY!”Hardly able to believe what I was reading, I called Pino at his office in Ohio around 4 p.m. According to his secretary, he had not been at work that day (he only has office hours two days of the week). He was drawing a paycheck from the people of the State of Ohio while trying to launch a Jihad against people like me. In fact, just five minutes before I called he posted an entry under the title “Crusaders Can’t Take Anymore in Afghanistan!”

Pino began his morning of not going into his office at Kent State by penning a post under the title “Frightened British Crusaders Rush More Troops to Occupied Afghanistan.” Using terms like “occupation” and “Crusaders” it isn’t really necessary to read these posts in order to ascertain who this employee of the State of Ohio is rooting for in the War on Terror.

But, just in case you were curious about the purpose of this site, it is provided in the upper right corner: “We are a jihadist news service, and provide battle dispatches, training manuals, and jihad videos to our brothers worldwide. All we want is to get Allah’s pleasure. We will write ‘Jihad’ across our foreheads, and the stars. The angels will carry our message throughout the world.”

There is also an “Oath of Freedom” in the upper right corner: “We were born free. We will live freely and when death comes to us, we will die freely. Jihad is changing all that can be changed; freeing ourselves through our own efforts; and the conviction that truth will prevail, inshallah.”

Under the entry “Sister Detonates Herself to Eliminate Shia Traitors” there is a description of a female suicide bomber who recently killed 41 people. Just in case you wondered how the host of the site feels about the suicide bomber, the next line tells you: “Now she lies on the Golden Couch of Paradise.”

UPDATE: More on Pino here.

Cover-Up Alleged After Botched Cross-Border Operation


No matter what your political views, you have to get a laugh out of this one. If you don’t you may need to talk to someone about getting a sense of humor!


Bill, Hillary & Al in Heaven


And so it starts……………


Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, and Al Gore were in a plane crash. They’re up in Heaven, and God’s sitting on the great white throne.


God addresses Al first. “Al, what do you believe in?”


Al replies, “Well, I believe I won that election, but that it was your will that I did not serve. And I’ve come to understand that now.”


God thinks for a second and says, “Okay, very good. Come and sit at my left.”


God then addresses Bill. “Bill, what do you believe in?”


Bill replies, “I believe in forgiveness. I’ve sinned, but I’ve never held a grudge against my fellow man, and I hope no grudges are held against me.”


God thinks for a second and says, “You are forgiven, my son. Come and sit at my right.”


God then addresses Hillary. “Hillary, what do you believe in?”


Hillary replies, “I believe you’re in my chair.”



The Rape of Europe

The Rape of Europe
By Paul  Belien

The German author Henryk M. Broder recently told the Dutch  newspaper “De Volkskrant” (12 October) that young Europeans who love freedom,  better emigrate.
Europe as we know it will no longer exist 20 years from now.  Whilst sitting on a terrace in
Berlin , Broder pointed to the other customers  and the passers-by and said melancholically: “We are watching the world of  yesterday.”
Europe is turning Muslim. As Broder is sixty years  old he is not going to emigrate himself. “I am too old,” he said. However, he  urged young people to get out and “move to Australia or
New Zealand . That is  the only option they have if they want to avoid the plagues that will turn the  old continent uninhabitable.”
Many Germans and Dutch, apparently,  did not wait for Broder’s advice. The number of emigrants leaving the Netherlands and
Germany has already surpassed the  number of immigrants moving in. One does not have to be prophetic to predict, like Henryk  Broder, that
Europe is becoming Islamic. Just consider the  demographics.

The number of Muslims in contemporary
Europe is  estimated to be 50 million. It is expected to double in twenty years . By  2025, one third of all European children will be born to Muslim families.  Today Mohammed is already the most popular name for new-born boys in Brussels  , Amsterdam ,
Rotterdam , and other major European cities.
Broder  is convinced that the Europeans are not willing to oppose  islamization.  “The dominant ethos ,” he told De Volkskrant, “is perfectly voiced by the  stupid blonde woman author with whom I recently debated. She said that it is  sometimes better to let yourself be raped than to risk serious injuries while  resisting . She said it is sometimes better to avoid fighting than run the  risk of death.”

In a recent op-ed piece in the
Brussels newspaper  De Standaard (23 October) the Dutch (gay and self-declared “humanist”) author  Oscar Van den Boogaard refers to Broder’s interview. Van den Boogaard says  that to him  coping with the islamization of
Europe is like “a process of mourning.” He is overwhelmed by a  “feeling of sadness.” “I am not a warrior,” he says, “but who is? I have never  learned to fight for my freedom. I was only good at enjoying  it.”

As Tom Bethell wrote in this month’s American  Spectator: “Just at the most basic level of demography the secular-humanist  option is not working.” But there is more to it than the fact that non-religious people  tend not to have as many children as religious people, because many of them  prefer to “enjoy” freedom rather than renounce it for the sake of  children.  Secularists,  it seems to me, are also less keen on fighting. Since they do not believe in an  afterlife, this life is the only thing they have to lose. Hence they will  rather accept submission than fight. Like the German feminist Broder referred to, they  prefer to be raped than to resist.
“If faith collapses, civilization goes  with it,” says  Bethell. That is the real cause of the closing of civilization in
Europe .  Islamization is simply the consequence. The very word Islam means “submission”  and the secularists have submitted already. Many Europeans have already become  Muslims, though they do not realize it or do not want to admit  it.

Some of the people I meet in the U.S. are particularly worried about  the rise of anti-Semitism in
Europe . They are correct when they fear that  anti-Semitism is also on the rise among non-immigrant Europeans. The latter hate people  with a fighting spirit. Contemporary anti-Semitism in
Europe (at least when  coming from native Europeans) is related to anti-Americanism. People who are  not prepared to resist and are eager to submit, hate others who do not want to  submit and are prepared to fight. They hate them because they are afraid that  the latter will endanger their lives as well. In their view everyone must  submit.

This is why they have come to hate Israel and  America so much, and the small band of European “islamophobes” who dare to  talk about what they see happening around them. West Europeans have to choose  between submission ( Islam) or death. I fear, like Broder, that they have  chosen submission – just like in former days when they preferred to be red  rather than  dead.
Europeans  apparently never read John Stuart Mill:
War is an ugly thing, but  not the ugliest of things; the decayed and degraded state of moral and  patriotic feeling which thinks nothing worth a war, is worse . A man who has  nothing which he cares more about than he does about his personal safety is a  miserable creature who has no chance at being free, unless made and kept so by  the exertions of better men than himself.

The Inconvenient Truth about Muslim Extremists

The Inconvenient Truth about Muslim Extremists
Jason Rantz
Author: Jason Rantz
Source: The Family Security Foundation, Inc.
Date: February 7, 2007

While a documentary based on questionable science is honored at the Academy Awards and shown throughout college campuses, another one based on the cold stark facts of our real world is not.  FSM Contributing Editor Jason Rantz explains how such a travesty could happen.

The Inconvenient Truth about Muslim Extremists

By Jason Rantz

Former Vice President and apocalyptic visionary Al Gore is one happy man today. Fresh off a win for Best Documentary Film by the Academy Awards Sunday night, Gore – and his “crisis climate” friends – are seeing copies of the documentary get screened all across the country on college campuses.

Since An Inconvenient Truth was released in theaters last year, college administrators, professors and hippie, self-aware students have flocked together to discuss how on earth they can save… the earth. Pushing the facts about global warming aside, they have created a false sense of urgency and are propagandizing their classmates to fix the “crisis” by showing the documentary.

Indeed, a screening of An Inconvenient Truth kicked off “Green Week” at George Washington University. Free screenings have aired at Penn State, Holy Cross, Macalester College, University of Rochester, and other colleges, big and small. All this, despite the questionable science behind the film.

Even though Gore seems to think the debate on global warming is over, actual scientists and other experts tend to disagree. National Review Online author and senior fellow in environmental studies at the CATO Institute Patrick Michaels strongly questions the fuzzy science behind Gore’s documentary and declares “When it comes to global warming, apparently the truth is inconvenient.” Oregon State’s climatologist George Taylor “has said human activity isn’t the chief cause of global climate change.” And two terrific books, that should be mandatory reading on many college campuses, lay out the inconsistencies of the climate crisis studies: Marlo Lewis, Jr. of the Competitive Enterprise Institute penned the A Skeptic’s Guide to An Inconvenient Truth and Chris Horner, senior fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, recently published the Politically Incorrect Guide to Global Warming (and Environmentalism).

Yet despite the lively debate over global warming, campuses seem to move ahead to fix a problem that is not really considered an immediate threat. They seem utterly convinced that global warming can take this planet at any time.

Ironically, there is an immediate threat that faces not just the United States, but civilized countries across the globe, which isn’t tackled with the sense of urgency that it demands – Jihadism.

Whereas An Inconvenient Truth is welcomed with open arms, Obsession is not. Obsession is a frightening documentary on the extreme Muslims who wish to destroy Western civilization and everything it stands for.  Rather than get support from American campuses, administrators and students are doing whatever they can to get the documentary screenings shut down.

Indeed, at the University of California at Los Angeles, dozens of protestors showed up to a screening of Obsession. The screening’s intent was to denounce “militant Islamic radicalism,” but the PC-left didn’t think it was appropriate.  According to the Daily Bruin, “Representatives from the Muslim Student Association and Students for Justice were gathered outside the event because they said it portrayed Islam in a negative light in that it highlighted the radical sects of the religion.”  (An aside: I wonder if these students protested outside theaters that showed the Academy Award nominated Jesus Camp, which highlighted the radical sects of Christianity; one wonders if they protested during seminars that portrays big business and capitalism as a leading contributor to the “climate crisis”).

As I reported several weeks ago, Pace University pressured the campus Jewish group to cancel its screening of Obsession. (After conservative bloggers and publications reported this, Pace quickly backed away and tried to spin their actions). Similarly, at State University of New York at Stony Brook, the campus Jewish group was pressured into canceling their Obsession screening.

Unlike An Inconvenient Truth, there is not much serious debate over the dangers of the extremists portrayed in Obsession.  Indeed, the student protestors and critics of the film are mad that the film accurately portrays the extremists in the religion and not the normal practitioners of Islam. The only people who seem to think we’re not at war with terrorists are the New York Times and CBS.

Why are leftist campuses so eager to accept An Inconvenient Truth, but so hesitant to accept the inconvenient truth about militant Islam? It’s pretty simple, really: anti-American sentiment.

You see, those behind the “climate crisis” lunacy are the same people who hate our capitalistic ways. They want big business to suffer; every time they see a Starbucks or WalMart, they scream in anger. They see capitalism as exploiting the poor and weak, all while polluting Mother Earth. And they just hate it!

On the other hand, they secretly agree with some anti-American Islamo-fascists who want to put an end to our Western ways.  Much like our Islamic enemies, they see a problem with Western culture: our excess, our waste, our “arrogant” attitudes.  No, the environmentalist hippies don’t want us to suffer car bombs or planes-as-missiles – but they do want to put a dent in the ways of big business.  And an easy way to get us to stop driving SUVs or drinking coffee from Starbucks or buying cheaper good from WalMart is to tell us – subtly and sometimes not-so-subtly – that every time we partake in big business, we are helping to destroy the planet.  And no one wants to be told their actions will lead to our extinction. Contributing Editor Jason Rantz is a producer and talk radio show host based in Southern California whose program has been called “irreverent and skillfully witt.y. His program frequently broadcasts on Free FM in San Diego, California. Check your local listings or listen to his show online at his website

© 2003-2007 All Rights Reserved

If you are a reporter or producer who is interested in receiving more information about this writer or this article, please email your request to

Note — The opinions expressed in this column are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions, views, and/or philosophy of The Family Security Foundation, Inc.