Holocaust Deniers and Their Supporters

Holocaust Deniers and Their Supporters
By Ariel Cohen
FrontPageMagazine.com | January 29, 2007

January 27th was the anniversary of the liberation of
Auschwitz (1944).  It was also U.N.-sponsored International Holocaust Commemoration Day. Many countries joined in support of a UN resolution, initiated by the
United States, which “condemns without reservation any denial of the Holocaust” and urges UN member states “unreservedly to reject any denial of the Holocaust as an historical event.”
The U.S. Acting Ambassador to the UN Alejandro D. Wolff said that “those who would deny the Holocaust – and, sadly, there are some who do – reveal not only their ignorance, but their moral failure as well.” In a recent lecture, the newly elected Secretary General of the UN Ban Ki-moon said, in a veiled reference to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, “Denying historical facts, especially on such an important subject as the Holocaust, is just not acceptable. Nor is it acceptable to call for the elimination of any State or people… We must apply the lessons of the Holocaust to today’s world.”Heeding his call, 103 countries co-sponsored the resolution, which passed by consensus and without a vote. The Holocaust was one of the defining events of the past century. It should be one of its most important lessons. But who is refusing to learn from the mass slaughter? Who voiced objections to the UN resolution and who opposed it?  Those who do not wish to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Unsurprisingly, Iran made a strong statement against the resolution, focusing instead on Hiroshima and
Nagasaki, and the treatment of the Palestinians. None of the Arab nations, and most Muslim countries refused to co-sponsor. 
This is a chilling fact. It says a great deal not just about the Iranian state of mind, but of its intentions. By supporting Holocaust denial Teheran is legitimizing it – and paving the way to a new Holocaust. The deafening silence of the Arab states, even though some, like Egypt and Jordan, are formally at peace with Israel, as well as the stance of nuclear-armed
Pakistan, makes one wonder how deep both denial of history and hatred of the Jews go.
Even Kofi Anan, hardly a friend of Israel, stated at the end of his tenure that “… the [Iranian] rhetoric implies a refusal to concede the very legitimacy of
Israel’s existence, let alone the validity of its security concerns... Today Israelis are often confronted with words and action that seem to confirm their fear that the goal of their adversaries is to extinguish their existence as a state and as a people.”
The U.S. and Israel have warned that Iran‘s stance on the Holocaust—and its president’s assertions that
Israel should be wiped off the map—аre in direct violation of the UN Charter and should be viewed with extreme concern in light of its defiant development of nuclear capabilities.
“While the nations of the world gather here… with the intent of never again allowing genocide, a member of this assembly is acquiring the capabilities of carrying out its own,” said
Israel‘s Ambassador to the UN Dan Gillerman.
Ahmadinejad’s nuclear arms race and calls to destroy
Israel are connected by an umbilical cord to hatred. The nexus between the Holocaust and anti-Western and anti-Semitic Islamist ideology are well known and well documented. Twentieth century Muslim radicals were Hitler’s willing accomplices.  Leading among them was the Mufti of Jerusalem Hajj Amin Al Housseini, Yasser Arafat’s relative and mentor.
At the Nurenberg trials of the Nazi leadership, Adolf Eichmann’s deputy Dieter Wisliceny testified that “The Mufti was one of the initiators of the systematic extermination of European Jewry and had been a collaborator and adviser of Eichmann and (SS Chief Heinrich) Himmler in the execution of this plan… He was one of Eichmann’s best friends and had constantly incited him to accelerate the extermination measures. I heard him to say, accompanied by Eichmann, he had visited incognito the gas chambers of
After the war, the Mufti was the guest of the Muslim Brotherhood in
Egypt, the founder of which, Hassan al-Banna was an admirer of Hitler. Egypt gave refuge to Nazi propaganda experts and missile scientists, while
Syria harbored SS brass.

The chief ideologist of the Muslim Brotherhood, Sayyid Qutb, though an exchange student in Colorado, came to passionately hate the
United States, primarily because of the freedoms American women enjoy. He refined the anti-Western and anti-American trajectory of the Brotherhood, which later spawned even more extremist offshoots, such as Ayman al Zawahiri’s Egyptian Islamic Jihad, the constituent part of Al Qaeda. Hamas, which is bent on destroying
Israel, is also an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood. Qutb is still a guiding light among Islamist radicals.
Iran, Nazi sympathies ran deep even before World War Two, fuelled by hatred of the
British Empire. Reza Pahlavi, the father of the last Shah, renamed Persia Iran (meaning “Aryan” in Farsi) to signal his political sympathy to the Nazi “Arian” ideology.
Iran is a worldwide center of Holocaust denial. This did not start with Ahmadinejad’s December 2006 conference for Holocaust deniers, nor did it begin with
Iran’s macabre Holocaust cartoon competition, which has now been declared an annual event. Since 2000,
Iran has embraced Holocaust deniers  Jürgen Graf, Wolfgang Fröhlich, David Duke, and Roger Garaudy who claim that the Holocaust was a myth.
The refusal of
Iran and Arab countries to co-sponsor the UN Holocaust commemoration resolution, their rejection of Holocaust education, and the Iranian nuclear arms and ballistic missile program are signs of an approaching danger.
The implied embrace of the ideology and politics of hatred which brought about the Holocaust does not threaten
Israel alone. Radical Islamism, which embraces Holocaust denial, Jew hatred, and the denial of
Israel’s right to exist, also vehemently denies Western civilization its right to exist. It is a clear and present danger to world peace. It is laudable that the Holocaust is being commemorated at the UN But to preserve peace, the UN’s members need to do much more than adopt non-binding resolutions.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: