Illegals Demand Blanket Amnesty and US Citizenship

Illegals Demand Blanket Amnesty and US Citizenship

by Sher Zieve


As US political leaders become more and more feckless with regards to the illegal immigration problems plaguing the country, illegal aliens are becoming increasingly bolder and more vocal in their demands. On Saturday, a purported 15,000 member-strong group of illegal aliens and their leftist supporters once again took to the streets of Los Angeles. In the past, the illegal groups had issued “or else” ultimatums to the US government that it must pass an “illegal immigrant reform” bill. The “or else” involved the illegal immigrants’ refusing to work—but, still expecting to be paid—if the US did not meet their commandments. Now, however, they are demanding a blanket amnesty that entails no fines for being in the US illegally and no returns to Mexico in order to apply for US positions and residencies—nothing. Instead, the illegals carried signs commanding “Amnesty Now!” With regards to the proposed fines to be paid by illegal immigrants for having enjoyed—at no charge—the benefits of the United States of America (which include but are not limited to healthcare, public schooling and college tuition credits for illegals), protestor Armando Garcia shouted: “Charging that much, Bush is going to be even more expensive than the [illegal alien smuggler] coyotes!” Note: Mr. Garcia, other illegals and their attendant supporters blatantly ignore the fact that the costs associated with free illegal healthcare has closed and is closing multiple hospitals and emergency rooms throughout the country. Long ago, the “rights of illegals” supplanted the rights of American citizens.


The illegals and their friends are also balking at (horror of horrors!) having to pay $3,500 for a three-year US work permit—a permit that is said to be renewable. As many Latino groups (including MEChA, the Mexica Movement and La Raza) teach their adherents that the United States really belongs to Mexico, illegals have been led to believe that their presence in the USA is never illegal. However, they are also being taught that all of the “European settlers” are really the interlopers. Therefore, the illegals should not only be allowed to enter the United States but, they must be given all of the resources of our country—free of charge. As a side note, the Mexica Movement plans to deport the “illegal white squatters” back to Europe. The actual from-across-the-border illegals and their supporters refuse to even acknowledge that there is any differentiation between legal and illegal entry into the United States. As long as one is of “the race”—la raza—one should be allowed into our country, without question.


As strong indications of the growing attitude that illegal aliens should be “left alone” by ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) and/or any other group, long-time illegal immigrant Maria Lopez commented: “Last year, we were fighting for legalization, and this year we are fighting for legalization and against all these raids!” And illegal alien Alfredo Gonzalez added: “We need full legalization and need it now!” Immigrating illegally into the USA is now being promulgated by multiple leftist groups as a “human right” and I trust the ACLU—if not some legal-Eagle United Nations group—will be the next to argue this preposterous case in court. However, considering the liberal and leftist-oriented makeup of much of our judicial system, the possibility of a win for illegals is certainly not out of the realm of possibility. Besides, there would then be no need to protect our borders. Congress could spend all of that allocated Border Fence money on their own pet projects and our US Border Patrol Agents would be able to find new lines of work—instead of, currently, being placed in jail for doing their jobs! We could, also, do away with that pesky US Constitution that has plagued and stands in the way of the Left—and their leader-group the Democrat Party—accomplishing its goals. Note: This annoying document also stands in the way of Islamic terrorists entering the country. But, as they’re already here and are some of the new entrants into the Democrat Party that should be an additional incentive to do away with the “outdated” piece of paper.


After the Constitution has been dissolved the USA will have effectively lost its sovereignty. So, our once-elected leaders will be able to set up their own fiefdoms and collect all the taxes they wish from a newly-impoverished serf class. In that way, the Left, at least its now-wealthy leadership, will have placed the USA just where it wants it to be—in the same position as any other third or fourth-world country. Even without a feudal system, largely due to the influx of illegal workers into our country and their subsequent hiring, the US has already experienced a stagnation or significant drop in construction industry, farming, cleaning and food preparation wages.


In order to avoid the real and present possibility that there may soon no longer be any differentiation affected between legal and illegal US residency, it is essential that you contact your Congress people and US Senators to voice your opposition to the insanity and termination of the independence and rule of the United States of America. And we had best do it soon. Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) is attempting to push yet another bill through Congress—H. R. 984—that will stop the public from voicing opposition to any of their elected officials. The 2006 version failed, so the Democrats are trying it again. Shouldn’t this bill should be re-designated “H. R. 1984”—in memory of George Orwell?

Does Hillary Clinton Pass the Kitchen Test?

Does Hillary Clinton Pass the Kitchen Test?

by Carey Roberts


Just because she has assembled a well-oiled political machine and holds a commanding lead over the rest of the pack, doesn’t mean Hillary Clinton should go out and order the invitation cards for the inauguration ball. No, not by a long shot.


The true measure of Mrs. Clinton’s presidential stock is whether she can pass the Kitchen Test. You remember the Kitchen Test, right?


A couple years ago, president Bush nominated John Bolton as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations. I’ve met Mr. Bolton, and he seems to be a decent, straight-talking fellow.


But following Bolton’s senate confirmation hearing, senator George Voinovich of Ohio saw things differently: “I’ve heard enough today that I don’t feel comfortable about voting for Mr. Bolton. I think one’s interpersonal skills and their relationship with their fellow man – it’s a very important ingredient in anyone that works for me. I call it the Kitchen Test.”


Mr. Bolton flunked the Kitchen Test, which led to his eventual undoing. So I think it’s only fair that we also ask Mrs. Clinton to take the Kitchen Test. The voting public wants to know, how does Hillary Rodham Clinton treat her associates, aides, and family members?


So I’m sharing this remarkable compendium, with a hat-tip to my friends at Gateway Pundit. []


I will warn you, however, that many of these statements are coarse, unladylike, and entirely inappropriate for children. Gentle reader, proceed with extreme caution:


– “Put this on the ground! I left my sunglasses in the limo. I need those sunglasses. We need to go back!” — Hillary ordering a Marine One helicopter pilot to turn back while en route to Air Force One.


– “What are you doing inviting these people into my home? These people are our enemies! They are trying to destroy us!” — Hillary screaming to an aide, when she found out that some Republicans had been invited to the Clinton White House.


– “Son of a b*tch!” – Hillary’s opinion of President George W. Bush when she found out he secretly visited Iraq on Thanksgiving just days before her trip in 2003.


– “Where is the G-damn f**king flag? I want the G-damn f**king flag up every f**king morning at f**king sunrise.” — Hillary to the staff at the Arkansas Governor’s mansion on Labor Day, 1991.


– “You sold out, you mother f**ker! You sold out!” — Hillary yelling at a Democratic lawyer.


– “F**k off! It’s enough that I have to see you shit-kickers every day, I’m not going to talk to you too!! Just do your G*damn job and keep your mouth shut.” — Hillary to her State Trooper bodyguards after one of them greeted her with “Good morning.”


– “If you want to remain on this detail, get your f**king ass over here and grab those bags!” — Hillary to a Secret Service Agent who was reluctant to carry her luggage because he wanted to keep his hands free in case of an incident.


– “Get f**ked! Get the f**k out of my way!!! Get out of my face!!!” — Hillary’s comments to her Secret Service detail agents.


– “Stay the f**k back, stay the f**k away from me! Don’t come within 10 yards of me, or else! Just f**king do as I say, Okay!!!?” — Hillary screaming at her Secret Service detail.


But it turns out Hillary’s abusive tendencies go beyond brow-beating and foul-mouthed intimidation. Hillary Clinton is also a batterer.


The first incident happened in 1993 when Hillary went after Bill with her fingernails, leaving a “mean claw mark along his jawline.” White House spokeswoman Dee Dee Myers later explained that Hillary’s vicious attack had been provoked by singer Barbara Streisand’s visit to the White House. []

The second assault occurred on August 13, 1999 after Bill’s confession of the Monica Lewinsky affair. According to author Christopher Andersen, “Hillary rose to her feet and slapped him across the face — hard enough to leave a red mark that would be clearly visible to Secret Service agents when he left the room.”


Then there are the accounts of Hillary hurling ashtrays, lamps, and books, once leaving a mark on Bubba’s face that required make-up. On one occasion Bill implored his Secret Service agent, “Keep that b*tch away from me!” The First Lady’s press secretary subsequently declined to deny these accounts. []


As we all know, there’s no excuse for domestic violence. By any standard, these incidents are shocking and deplorable.


Mrs. Clinton, I’m afraid you don’t pass the Kitchen Test, especially for a job as demanding as Commander in Chief. And the U.N. ambassador post is obviously out of the question. Have you considered running for county dog-catcher?

An African Asks Some Disturbing`Questions of Islam

An African Asks Some Disturbing

 Questions of Islam

It is true that there is a lot of anti-black racism in Britain, and sadly some churches and misguided Christians have at times allowed other people’s anti-Black and anti-poor attitudes to mould them. The Bible, though, tells us to love the poor, the stranger, the foreigner and the defenceless. After all, the Lord Jesus Christ was Himself a child refugee in Africa (Matthew 1-2).

To equate Biblical Christianity with anti-Black racism is absurd. We must remember that Moses, the prophet, married an African, and God was angry at the racism of Moses’ own sister Miriam. In fact, God punished her with leprosy for seven days (see Numbers 12). The God of the Bible hates racism.

Yet what puzzles me is how Black people in Britain are jumping so easily into what I believe is a real racist religion: Islam.

* A Disturbing Question Concerning the Muslim QUR’AN
* A Disturbing Question Concerning African HISTORY
* A Disturbing Question Concerning Muslim SLAVERY
* A Disturbing Question Concerning Muslim CULTURE
* Conclusion

Click here to download a Windows ‘Help’ version of this document.

*A Disturbing Question Concerning the Muslim QUR’AN

Take for instance the Muslim holy book the Qur’an, which says:

    “On the day when some faces will be whitened and some faces will be blackened, say to those whose faces will be blackened, ‘Did ye reject faith after accepting it? Taste then the penalty for rejecting faith.’ But those whose faces will be whitened, they will be in God’s mercy: therein to dwell.” (Sura Al-i-Imran, 3:106-107)

The question which I ask as a black man is why is white equated with goodness and black equated with evil? (see Yusuf Ali, footnote 432)

*A Disturbing Question Concerning Muslim HISTORY

As an African I am also very puzzled at the lack of balanced historical research by Muslims concerning the African people.In North Africa we know that the whole Saharan region of Morocco, Libya, Algeria and Egypt to the Sudan and Ethiopia used to be Christian, before Islam came and destroyed the local churches. Why do we not hear about it in Muslim literature?

And consider this: Africa produced great thinkers like Augustine of Hippo (Algeria), Clement and Athanasius of Egypt, and Tertullian of Carthage (Tunis), while Ethiopia had the first African church totally independent of Europe (Acts 8). In fact, I find it most interesting that an African church was planted first before there was ever a church in Britain, Canada, the USA or Spain, or any other European state. So why do we not hear of this African church, and why do we not continue to see any remnants of it today?

Perhaps we need to go to the Qur’an again to find the clue. Consider this verse in Sura Tauba, 9:5:

    “Fight and slay [those who associate another with God (Shirk)], and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem of war.”

It fits the pattern of Islam which fights against all those who choose to follow their own beliefs, an idea we find well expressed in Sura Imran, 3:28:

    Let not the believers take disbelievers [Christians and Jews] for their friends in preference to believers. Whoso doeth that hath no connection with Allah unless (it be) that ye but guard yourselves against them, taking (as it were) security. Allah biddeth you beware (only) of Himself.

The history of the Sudan is a case in point. Before the Muslim invasion of 1275 A.D. by the Islamic Mamluks of Egypt, the Sudan had three mini-Christian states called:

NOBATIA in the north, the capital of Qustul,
MAKURIA, the capital of old Dongola, and
ALODIA or ALWA, the capital of Soba.

These three Christian countries, from 300 A.D. to 1500 A.D. had their own written language, great centers of learning, international commerce with Egypt, Ethiopia and other Middle East states, and sent out missionaries to other African states (see K. Milhalowski,Faras, vol.2, Poland, 1965 for extensive archaeological and historical documentation on these states).

Even the Arab, ibn Selim al-Assuani, was impressed when he saw Soba, describing it as having, …fine buildings, roomy houses, churches, and the land is more fruitful than Makuria…[and it has] much meat, and good horses.

But all this was destroyed by Muslim invaders in 1275 A.D., not European colonialists! The same type of massive destruction happened all over Africa, yet we never hear anyone holding the Muslims responsible! Why? Arab Muslim racism is just as obnoxious as that of the Europeans, so why is it allowed to continue?

For it is continuing. In the 1990’s Sudan in north-east Africa has been suffering a Muslim jihad-war, whereby thousands of Christians and unbelievers have died, many by crucifixion, or have suffered by having their hands and feet on alternate sides cut off. Is it only coincidental that we find in the Qur’an, Sura 5 (the Table Spread) verse 33, the sanction for this very practice?

    “The only reward of those who make war upon Allah and his Messenger and strive after corruption in the land will be that they will be killed or crucified, or have their hands and feet on alternate sides cut off…”

While this is going on, Muslim states have never once told off the Islamic government of Khartoum. Why the silence? Yet there has always been a lot of noise about the apartheid of the old South Africa. Why the double standard?

*A Disturbing Question Concerning Muslim SLAVERY

That then brings me to the question of slavery. Muslims say it is only a Christian phenomenon. Yet while the British Empire was abolishing slavery under pressure from British Christians like David Livingstone and William Wilberforce, Arab Muslims were enslaving Africans (i.e. following the promise by Allah concerning the (captives) that your right hand possesses from Sura Nisaa, 4:3). Have you not read about the islands of Zanzibar and Pembe in East Africa, during the nineteenth century? Or have you not questioned why Muslim countries have never been involved in the movement for the abolition of slavery?Let me set the record straight. While Europeans were involved with the slave trade for a few hundred years, the existence of the traffic of African slaves had been well established one-thousand years before.

The Muslim position which places the entire blame for the invention and practice of black slavery at the door of Christian Europe, is simply not historically tenable. Both the Grecian and Roman societies were slave states, yet most of their slaves were Caucasian. In fact, the word slave meant a person who was of Slavic origin. Robert Hughes, in his essay on The Fraying of America in the February 3, 1992 issue of Time magazine corrects this false impression when he says:

“The African slave trade as such, the black traffic, was an Arab invention, developed by traders with the enthusiastic collaboration of black African ones, institutionalized with the most unrelenting brutality, centuries before the white man appeared on the African continent, and continuing long after the slave market in North America was finally crushed… Nothing in the writings of the Prophet [Muhammad] forbids slavery, which is why it became such an Arab-dominated business. And the slave traffic could not have existed without the wholehearted cooperation of African tribal states, built on the supply of captives generated by their relentless wars. The image promulgated by pop-history fictions like Roots – of white slavers bursting with cutlass and musket into the settled lives of peaceful African villages – is very far from the historical truth. A marketing system had been in place for centuries, and its supply was controlled by Africans. Nor did it simply vanish with Abolition. Slave markets, supplying the Arab Emirates, were still operating in Djibouti in the 1950’s; and since 1960, the slave trade has flourished in Mauritania and the Sudan. There are still reports of chattel slavery in northern Nigeria, Rwanda and Niger.”

The argument by some Muslims that slavery was God’s way of converting Africans to Islam, is much the same argument suggested by certain misguided Christians in the 19th century who said that, bringing Africans to America gave them the opportunity to hear the Gospel; an argument which holds no credibility in the Bible, and dishonours the character of God.

Unfortunately Islam still hasn’t learned, as today the slavery of foreign nationals still exists in the heartland of Islam: Saudi Arabia. (UN Report on Slavery, 1994)

*A Disturbing Question Concerning Muslim CULTURE

Muslims claim that the Christian West wishes to control Africa. Yet why is it that we Africans must not like the Coca Cola culture of the West, but we are obliged to start wearing seventh century Arab dress once Islam is taken on? What’s wrong with my good African cultural dress? And why is it that Black African Muslims are obliged to pray facing a Saudi Arabian city: Mecca? Who is dominating who? Why not face the local town (i.e. Nairobi or Lusaka, etc.)? I thought God was everywhere, and that prayer should be directed to Him who lives in heaven above the earth. Remember, Jesus, the Truth once said I am from above, you are from beneath.Furthermore, why are we required to read God’s word and speak to Him only in Arabic? Does God only speak Arabic? Is He not capable of understanding my African language? Thank God that the Holy Bible is now in over 2,000 known languages around the world. Because I know my God is able to speak every language. It’s not a problem for Him.


This letter has been written out of love–love for the truth, even when it hurts. The Bible tells us that we African people have a tremendous African heritage, which at times in our history has been hijacked. Yet God is our creator and He believes in us. After all, He chose Adam and Eve to be the African people’s first parents.God has also used Africa for other purposes, such as allowing Egypt to be a refuge for the Jews at the time of Joseph (Genesis 39-50). And when God (Jesus) became incarnate as a man, He took refuge in Egypt, Africa, during part of His childhood. Ethiopia, another African state, has possessed the Bible in her own language for many centuries, even before Islam began.

In the future place of Heaven we are told many nations are there, including African ones (Revelation 21:24). The Bible, furthermore, tells us that we (all nations) are set free in the blood of Jesus, who died on the cross and was raised from the dead.

Unlike the God of the Qur’an, Jesus never ordered any Christians to kill for Him or to take (the captives) that your right hand possesses. Everyone was given the choice to choose Him or reject Him. Throughout the Bible we find God saving all that call upon His name (the name of Jesus). This included the Ethiopian of Jeremiah 38-40 and the Ethiopian in Acts 8, and it includes me and you today.

Now that I have asked my questions, you too ask yours. Who indeed has helped me as an African the most: Islam or Christianity? You need to choose wisely, because your life depends on it.

Brother Banda

The Great Al-Qaeda “Patriot”

The Great Al-Qaeda “Patriot”
By Paul Sperry | April 9, 2007

A man identified as “Esam Omesh” spoke just before Cindy Sheehan at last month’s antiwar rally that Sheehan headlined in Washington.

Following chants of “Impeach Bush!” from shivering protesters, Omesh took the podium and exhorted “brothers and sisters” to condemn Bush for the deaths of “more than 650,000 Iraqi lives.” He demanded the White House “pull our troops out of Iraq now” and “end the war today.”

The speaker counted himself among the “great American patriots” who braved the cold to march on Washington and protest the war that day.

While there may have been legitimate voices there, this speaker decidedly was not one of them. Not because he’s Muslim, but because he’s an Islamist tied to an al-Qaida fund raiser and the spiritual adviser to the 9/11 hijackers.

Turns out it his real name is Esam S. Omeish, and he runs a nonprofit group in Washington called the Muslim American Society, which the FBI believes is the U.S. branch of the dangerous Muslim Brotherhood, a worldwide jihadist movement that operates like the mafia. The secret Islamist society counts Osama bin Laden, Ayman al-Zawahri, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and blind sheik Omar Abdel Rahman among its members. Its motto: “The Quran is our constitution, the prophet is our guide; Death for the glory of Allah is our greatest ambition.”

His office is right next door to the old office of one of Al-Qaida’s top fund raisers in America, Abdurahman Alamoudi, before he was jailed a few years ago. And it’s located in the same Alexandria, Va., business park as the former office of Osama bin Laden’s nephew, before he hightailed it back to Saudi Arabia after 9/11.

“Omesh” is not the legal spelling of his name. He may spell it that way for the media, but that’s not how it’s listed in court documents I’ve examined. The correct spelling is Omeish with an “i.” Perhaps he leaves it out to avoid links to his brother, Mohamed S. Omeish.

As I first reported in my book, “Infiltration: How Muslim Spies and Subversives Have Penetrated Washington,” Mohamed Omeish headed the U.S. branch of one of bin Laden’s favorite Saudi charities, the International Islamic Relief Organization, which was raided after 9/11. Tax records I’ve obtained show Omeish shared an office with Alamoudi, the convicted al-Qaida-tied terrorist and godfather of the Muslim mafia in America. This is the same “moderate” Muslim leader who federal prosecutors caught on tape complaining bin Laden hadn’t killed enough Americans.

It gets worse. Esam S. Omeish also sits on the board of the 9/11-tied mosque in Washington that helped the hijackers get licenses and housing, and whose imam prepared them for martyrdom operations in private closed-door sessions. Omeish personally hired the imam, Anwar Aulaqi, who fled the country on a Saudi jet about a year after 9/11 (the FBI now wants another crack at questioning him).

Dar al-Hijrah Islamic Center, which tax records show has received large donations from the Islamic Relief Organization, is a Muslim Brotherhood bastion. Another former imam and current prayer leader, for example, is an admitted Brotherhood member from the Sudan. The mosque’s deed was signed by an Alamoudi crony who has admitted participating in the Brotherhood’s “Ikhwan” movement in America.

Dar al-Hijrah is a turnstile for terrorists and terror suspects. A prayer leader, Sheikh Mohammed al-Hanooti, was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the first World Trade Center bombing. Other dubious mosque members have included: Alamoudi, Abdullah bin Laden, Osama’s nephew; Hamas leader and fugitive Mousa Abu Marzook and his partners Ismail Elbarasse and Abdelhaleem Ashqar, who was convicted of obstruction of justice in February; convicted Virginia Jihad Network leader Randall “Ismail” Royer, a former CAIR official; and Ahmed Omar Abu Ali, an al-Qaida operative recently convicted of plotting to assassinate President Bush.

Leaders of the mosque rallied around Ali, calling the trial a Zionist “witch hunt,” even after it became obvious he was guilty.

What’s more, the phone number to the mosque was found in the German apartment of Ramzi bin al-Shibh, roommate of 9/11 ringleader Mohamed Atta. Atta’s deputy “emir” in the “raid” on America, Nawaf al-Hazmi, worshipped at Dar al-Hijrah, along with the pilot who crashed the plane into the Pentagon.

Back to mosque leader Esam Omeish, the “American patriot.” Court records I’ve obtained show he put his home up for bond collateral in 2004 to help spring from jail a terrorist suspect who was caught allegedly casing the Chesapeake bridge for attack. His dubious pal Ismail Elbarasse is a founding member of Dar al-Hijrah.

Omeish’s house is just down the road from the mosque in Falls Church, Va., and just a few blocks in the other direction from the Islamist business park in Alexandria. One of Omeish’s neighbors on his cul-de-sac is the former bookkeeper for terror banker Soliman Biheiri. He started an Islamic investment bank that included Hamas leader Marzook and Abdullah bin Laden as major investors. Biheiri, a member of the Muslim Brotherhood, was recently convicted of lying about his connections to Marzook in an investigation into his terrorist ties.

It’s one big happy Islamist family in Omeish’s neck of the woods.

This is who is rallying opposition to the war. Omeish may claim to be an “American patriot,” but even Cindy Sheehan should know better. The people she’s consorting with would not have shed a tear had her son been beheaded in Iraq.

Click Here to support


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 55 other followers